The last time American voters selected a movement based candidate who promised us "post partisanship" and consensus building instead of experience and a track record of production, George Bush became the 43rd president of the United States.
The last time American voters selected a movement based candidate who promised us "post partisanship" and consensus building instead of experience and a track record of production, George Bush became the 43rd president of the United States.
Like Barack Obama, George Bush downplayed the necessity of experience. After all, you don't need experience when you have gut instinct, or judgment as we're calling it these days. But this entry isn't about George Bush or even about Barack Obama. It's about change versus more of the same. After experiencing the peace and prosperity of the 90's and the war and inequality of the Bush administration I've realized something. inexperienced leadership is what got us the faulty intelligence which lead to war and inexperience created the environment where corporations are running America. It turns out that inexperienced leadership is the "more of the same" that I'm desperately seeking to change from. So I ask myself and fellow democrats; how about we have some experience for a change?
I'm a young voter. I want hope and I want change. I think every American wants these things, regardless of their demographic. But hope is only a means to an end. You know what I hope for?
- Millions of Jobs created
What does Clinton politics empirically produce?
- Millions of Jobs created
Face it. The status quo is filled with inexperienced candidates who promised us one thing and delivered the exact opposite. Running as the change candidate is more of the same that I don't need. I miss experienced leadership.
|
|
|
Permalink :: 19 Comments :: Post a Comment
|
In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.
If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.
